So, like the article states, does Rollins believe it is just too expensive and tricky politically to keep campus media alive? I'm not positive, but they sure act like it. This article states that some campus media organizations are being shut down because there's no money being made from it. I would directly associate this to the leaders of these organizations. Why, well because personally I've raised somewhere in the $5,000 range in underwriting and collectively another $11,000. The majority of this money was easily obtained. If the was a competent individual in the higher position who cared about this, then the money would be raised on a daily basis, and could triple these figures monthly, if dedicated.
On the physical aspects again, it was interesting to find out Pearson also noticed the locations as being "in a basement, or rooms resembling closets." Most importantly Pearson points out that activities in media design, writing, producing, require an inspirational setting. Luckily, we've got a great location with WPRK, but not so much for the rest of Rollins Campus Media. It would be great to bring them all to the same level of the Mills building one day.
"Team members must be trained properly to ensure excellent work." This is a GREAT idea! I liked reading that this is what should be happening, but in reality is not happening. The ship will sail regardless, yes, and this maybe the thought process of Rollins, but what if the ship sailed with excellence and also raised money for the not for profit status?
"Journalism (and media) is changing not disappearing. Those who can bend with the winds of change and modify their views will thrive."
ReplyDelete